|
Their single hit of “Timothy” made the number 13 spot on the national
charts. “Give Up Your Guns,” which came next, cracked the top 50.
These successes were followed
by tunes such as “Bloodknot” and “Liza’a Last Ride.”
In terms of area popularity,
The Buoys soared to heights which were unheard of previously. But
their dreams of sustaining a national image failed to materialize.
Oh, yes, the group did tour
and serve as the opening act for many top name groups and individuals.
And, yes, Kelly, Hludzik,
Fran Brozena, Chris Hanlon, and Carl Siracuse could rightly claim the
bragging rights to being this area’s most sought after ensemble.
But the group never made it
to the place of being able to headline a national concert tour. Still,
multiple benefits accrued to their talents.
“For a while,” explains
Kelly, “it was good enough to be on the top of the local heap.
“You know, we’d hit one of
the area diners on a Saturday night and there’d be guys from other groups
there, talking about their jobs.
“One guy’d say, ‘We just came
from such and such high school dance.’ Another guy would tell how they had
brought the house down at club so and so.’
“Then they’d ask us where
we’d been and we’d tell them something like Pittsburgh or Boston or some
other big city.
KIND OF STUPID
“It sounds kind of stupid, but at the time
it was a nice feeling to lay something like that on them.
“They would have been busting
themselves all night and we would have flown somewhere, played 45 minutes,
and flown back home before they were done.”
But Kelly and Hludzik aren’t
easily satisfied with where they are. They have long harbored dreams of
making it big. No, make that BIG!
“Having a hit with “Timothy”
at such a young age kind of spoiled Jerry and me,” Kelly says. “You know,
all the attention. Limos. Playing before big audiences in large theaters
and auditoriums with the best sound and lighting equipment.
“Not to put anybody down, but
it was just kind of hard for Jerry and me to adjust to that old local club
circuit again. I mean, you see how things can be…how they should be…and
that’s the way you want them.
CAN’T BE COMFORTABLE
“If you’re like we are, you can’t scale
your goals back down and be comfortable.”
In the quest of trying to
make it as a band, it is not very difficult for some members to get on
each other’s nerves.
This agitation can be sparked
by many causes. Of these, two of the more prominent are differences of
opinion of how much work a group is going to do in order to become better
known and what the scope of the material played will be.
In the realm of music, ego
plays a pivotal cause in how long a group can exist as an entity. In order
to last, compromises have to be made. These concessions, when not
forthcoming, constitute another wedge that can drive a musical aggregation
apart.
“Let’s put it this way,”
Kelly says as he reconstructs the schism between The Buoys which
brought The Jerry-Kelly Band to pass.
“Certainly there are some
hard feeling left. Jerry and I don’t hate them and we hope they don’t hate
us. But they weren’t happy that we left.
TWO AGAINST THREE
“When we were part of the group, especially
in recent years, we weren’t happy how things were going. It got to be a
regular two-against-three kind of thing. When you get into that situation,
changes have to be made.”
From their vantage point,
which Kelly and Hludzik admit does not account for everything that
happened, it was felt that the group should do more demo work (cutting
tapes with the hopes of getting producers interested in them) and more
original material should be inserted into the group’s concert dates.
The fact that much of this
“original” material would come from the pens of Kelly and Hludzik, both
talented songwriters as well as singer-musicians, was a nettlesome thing
to the rest of the group.
“It also seemed,” Kelly
maintains, “that the other guys were quite content with the pattern we had
fallen into. They didn’t see the need to keep reaching out.
“But Jerry and I couldn’t
help it. We were hooked on the kind of rush you get from playing a first
class concert. To us, that’s what the business is all about.
“We just couldn’t reconcile
our differences.”
Kelly’s leaving marked the
exit of an original member of the group. For his part, while he had
participated in the successes of The Buoys, Hludzik was actually a
“Jerry-come-lately.”
At the aggregation’s
inception, six players were part of the membership, which Kelly points out
was initially managed by Bill Bachman, now the editorial spokesman for
WNEP television, but, in the mid ‘60s, a disc jockey for WBAX radio.
“It was Bachman,” Kelly
recalls, “ who gave us our name. He called himself the ‘boy from ‘BAX’ and
thought it would be kind of cute to be able to introduce us by saying,
‘Now, the boy from ‘BAX brings you The Buoys.
TASTELESS EXCESS
“That was really neat, huh?” Kelly laughs
as he remembers the tasteless excesses of that time.
“You did a lot of things for
attention. Long hair. Wild clothing. But even that was progress, because
we used to have a group called The Escorts and we wore white socks,
Beatle boots, whist shirts, dickeys and black pants.
“That was real cool, too,” as
he laughs again. “Actually, though,” he says, modifying his posture of
ridicule, “it wasn’t that bad of a group. We were one of the first groups
to sing. Most of the popular music then was instrumental. So, our singing
made us different.”
From The Escorts, the
next move was to The Buoys. The six-man group recorded “Timothy” in
1969. Nothing happened.
Disgusted, the group chose up
sides and split. Kelly, Brozena, and Hanlon retained the name. They
recruited Siracuse and Hludzik.
The group now had five
members and something else: a hit record, because in the early months of
’70, “Timothy” took off.
Briefly, The Buoys
hovered on the brink of crashing through the barrier into the big time.
They didn’t quite make it. But, they were close. So close.
“I’ve always felt we had the
talent,” says Kelly. “We’ve been around the stars and can really look at
ourselves and say, ‘Hey, we’re that good!’ I’ve felt it would be wrong to
shortchange ourselves by not reaching out."
COULDN’T WORK IT OUT
“I guess that with the conflicts we’ve had
internally, Jerry and I are as much to blame as anyone. But we’ve always
felt we were doing the right thing. We just couldn’t work it out with the
rest of the guys. The split became inevitable.”
But the troubles — as well as
the hopes — were just beginning for Kelly and Hludzik.
They formed The
Jerry-Kelly Band and cut a demo tape, while going about their routine
of club concerts.
A fellow named Mike Stahl
heard and enjoyed them at a concert in the Dallas, PA area.
Now, Mike Stahl isn’t your
basic local music fan. He happens to be the sound mixer for the
internationally popular group Chicago.
He asked Kelly and Hludzik if
they had a demo tape. They gave him one, which he was going to play for
Chicago’s manager at that time.
But The Buoys weren’t
the only group that experienced internal troubles. Chicago split
with their manager. Stahl, however, was so impressed with the demo tape
that he eventually cornered Danny Seraphine, the Chicago drummer
and a producer in his own right, and played it for him.
DULY IMPRESSED
Seraphine was duly impressed. He journeyed
to Pottsville late last summer to hear the new group. He liked what he
heard and persuaded his production partner, David “Hawk” Wolinski,
keyboard player for another group, Rufus, to sign The
Jerry-Kelly Band. At least, part of it.
A recording date was
scheduled for April in Los Angeles, but both Seraphine and Wolinski felt
that the other members of the existing Jerry-Kelly Band couldn’t
cut it in the studio sessions.
Their services were severed,
leaving more bruised feelings in the wake of Kelly and Hludzik’s progress.
Once the recording work
began, however, all this was soon forgotten.
Seraphine assembled his
studio musicians with the goal of having them sound like a club band.
NOT AS GOOD
On the West Coast, Kelly says, the bands
aren’t generally as good as in the east (with some obvious exceptions),
since the best musicians gravitate to studio work where they can make big
money with a lot less difficulty than concert tours entail.
The result of the recording
sessions, “Somebody Else’s Dream,” is an interesting, often exciting
album.
“We’re quite proud of it,”
Hludzik says, “ and we can’t say enough about the professionals who worked
on it.”
The album certainly
demonstrates how far sound production has come in the last 10 years of so.
Listening to it in comparison
with, say, “Dinner Music,” which was the album by The Buoys
containing “Timothy,” the contrast is obvious.
At the time of its
completion, “Dinner Music” was highly representative of professional
standards at that time, featuring Kelly’s tenor wailing to full advantage.
But, immediately after hearing “Somebody Else’s Dream,” the songs on “Dinner
Music” take on a kind of tinny, less-than-full quality.
COMBINATION OF FACTORS
There is a combination of factors involved.
As good as the musicians who
cut the “Dinner Music” disc were, their level of professional ability
falls far short of the talent assembled for “Somebody Else’s Dream.”
And Kelly’s voice – which,
once you hear it, has a recognition factor that couldn’t be any greater if
he were singing his name instead of lyrics – has come under control.
So, it is a far fuller sound
– both vocally and instrumentally – that marks The Jerry-Kelly Band’s
work than when Hludzik and Kelly were with The Buoys.
Both musicians feel that
“Dream” is something of which they can be completely proud.
Locally, record stores seem
to sense that the disc will be a giant. However, on the national level,
there are still plenty of question marks.
But their answers rest more with Hludzik and Kelly
having their current run of luck hold out than with any uncertainty
regarding their talent.
ONLY THE BEGINNING
“This is only the beginning,” Hludzik says,
“because our contract with Danny and Hawk calls for another two albums.
|